What is Hospitality? (Part 2)

[If you have not done so, read Part 1!]

Consider the fact too that “hospitality” comes from the word “hospital.” Recall the story of when Jesus was spending time with Matthew the tax collector, the Scripture recounts the following: “[B]ehold, many tax collectors and sinners came and were reclining with Jesus and his disciples. And when the Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” But when he heard it, he said, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick”(Matt. 9:10-12). Likewise, it is not the rich and wealthy who need hospitality but the needy, the stranger, the widow, the orphan. It is the foreigner that needs a host, the homeless that needs a place to stay.

And when we love the stranger, Scripture tells us, it may well be we are unknowingly offering our home to an angel (Heb 13:2) or perhaps even to Christ himself (Matt 25:31-40)! God does not afford us the certainty to distinguish when we are serving man or serving Christ, nor does he offer this as an option. For any man that does not love his brother cannot love God (1 Jn 2:10-11) and any man who does not love the stranger, orphan, and widow is clueless about the definition of religion (James 1:27). Everything is spiritual: there is no distinguishing between the sacred and secular, the divine and material, the glorious and the mundane. For when you see the face of the stranger, you see the face of God.

Consequently, however, we are not a people who know how to practice philoxenia (at least not very well). Rather, we have traded the practice of philoxenia for a culure of xenophobia. Fear (and capitalism) is what drives our home security systems, fenced in homes, and exorbitantly private lives. Fear is what sells our newspapers and drives our political policies. Rather than a culture of welcoming the stranger, we have a cult(ivating)ure of fear.

We have been led to believe that anything foreign ought to be feared (and use baseless notions to keep this idea alive), and we enjoy speaking in derogatory terms about anyone who is not like us (the fortifying aspect of community). “Those Mexicans” are going to steal our jobs and force us to all learn Spanish, we tell ourselves, to we should ship them off. “Those Middle Eastern” people better not come to our city, because they’re probably terrorists. “Those black people” better not move into our neighborhood or all the houses will become foreclosed. “Those homosexuals” better not come nearby or they’re likely to molest my children. Lies that contribute to a culture of xenophobia.

This culture of xenophobia is no more clearly seen than in our two-year (and almost over) heated presidential campaign. Numerous Republicans have utilized countless fear tactics to try to deter people from voting for Barack Obama. They have chanted his middle name “Hussein” in order to incite distrust and fear into America and make him into the “Other.” They have fabricated lies that Obama is a Muslim (which, by the way, when has being a Muslim been a smear tactic?). In fact, Rush Limbaugh went so far to say that Obama was not American but was an Arab (codeword for “Muslim,” which is a codeword for “terrorist”) and came from an Arab part of Africa. This is not only the continuation of a culture of fear, but its simply not true – Kenya (even though Obama is NOT “from” Kenya) is in sub-Saharan Africa, where the national language is English and 90% of its population identify themselves as Christian.

Obama has been said to pal around with terrorists, has been called a socialist (and if Obama is a socialist, then FDR must have been a reincarnated Karl Marx!), a Marxist, a communist, un-American (i.e., not White), has been called scary, unpatriotic, untrustworthy, suspicious, too radical, too risky, too liberal, and a whole number of other things. All of these comments have been made in order to scare the hell out of people and convince them that Obama is not one of us, is a stranger, is not a promoter of American (i.e. White) values, and that we ought to do everything (motivated by fear) to shore up our walls against him and anyone else that isn't just like us.

Christian leaders particularly have sunk to a new low when it comes to promoting a culture of xenophobia (and slander, I might add). Dr. James Dobson and Focus on the Family published a futuristic letter from 2012 that describes what four years of an Obama presidency has been like. The letter describes America as a place where pornography is freely displayed, euthanasia is a common practice, crime runs rampant because of Obama's view on gun laws, America has frequent blackouts because of such high environmental standards, has endured another four terrorist attacks, where homeschooling has been banned, where Christian doctors have been forced to perform abortions or be fired, and where Christians are emigrating to Australia and New Zealand in order to live by their convictions. Dobson even goes so far as to say that its the "younger evangelicals" fault that these things happened because they could have chosen not to vote for Obama. Others have said that a Christian simply can’t vote for Obama, or for any Democrat, and it is a sin to do so (and may wind you up in hell). Lies and fear tactics. As Jim Wallis says, Dr. Dobson owes Christians an apology.

This political turn in this essay is not meant to convince you to vote for Obama, and nor is it to say Obama is innocent of a negative campaign or saying un-hospitable statements (when he says “America is the last best hope for the world,” he is not being very friendly or welcoming or hospitable to all the other great people around the globe). But in the area of cultivating xenophobia, that simply hasn't been Obama's main tactic, because, frankly its difficult to arouse fear in people when your opponent is part of the traditional majority (e.g., white males). I believe there are plenty of good reasons not to vote for Obama and plenty of good reasons not to vote for McCain and godly Christians will go into the voting booth tomorrow and vote for one or the other because of their convictions (or for a 3rd-party candidate!).

Rather, my point is to say, as Christians we ought to be developing a culture of philoxenia and not xenophobia, so please do not allow fear tactics to determine how you vote. If you are going to vote this year, use your head and mind and don't just listen to all the sound bytes going around. Vote by your convictions. Don’t abstain from voting for McCain because you’re sick of him calling everyone his friend or because you’re tired of Palin’s fake Minnesota accent. And don’t abstain from voting for Obama simply because he has big ears or is black. In other words, don’t be stupid and ridiculous. Spend some time thinking about what vote will be most beneficial for the common good of not only America, but the world entire.

What is Hospitality? (Part 1)

I have often asked this question of late, and it came back into my mind recently when we hosted some out of town guests a couple weeks ago for a big philosophy conference here at Duquesne. I hope to write more about our interactions with our guests and what a joy it was to have them here in due time, but I wanted to get this question off my chest because of its timeliness.

So what is hospitality? In Christian circles, particularly, we throw this word around a lot, using it haphazardly and without contemplation. Oftentimes, we say someone is really hospitable if they’re really good at throwing parties, make good food for large groups, or their house is typically the place for people to hang out. These are all good things, but this is not at all what the word means.

The word “hospitality” comes directly from Latin, “hospitalitas.” In Latin, “hospitas” means hostess or friend. The Greek word in the Bible translated hospitality is “philoxenia” (eg, Rom 12:13) literally “the love of strangers,” or “strange love,” as I like to say (because to the world, loving strangers is really strange!). This nuance is carried over into the Latin word “hospitus” which can mean either “hospitable” or “strange, foreign.”

Thus, inviting friends over to one’s house is not philoxenia but more akin to philadelphia (“brotherly love”), or fraternity (Latin from “frater” = brother), or perhaps even cronyism at times. Why is this nuance important? Because when we invite our friends over, we expect reciprocity. If I have a friend over at my place, I expect them to do the same. I scratch your back, you scratch mine, right? But hospitality is supposed to be a gift – and gifts are freely given, no strings attached.

Jacques Derrida, a well-known contemporary philosopher (who is usually misunderstood and der-ided by Christians [Get it – Der-rida, der-ided? Derrida often did this kind of things with words which makes it all the more interesting!), wrote often about hospitality later in his life as it related to the notions of justice, nations, and democracy. He was very critical of fraternity because of its reciprocal nature and called for a democracy that involves unconditional hospitality, a welcoming of the stranger – a nation without borders, that welcomed the immigrant rather than drawing lines of superiority and inferiority based on nationality. Our understanding of nations, or of our community, ought to involve hospitality, a welcoming of the Other, the stranger, the orphan, the widow, and immigrant. But in order for this to be the case, some nuances of the word “community” must be removed. Thus, Derrida would often speak of a “community without community,” with the point being of trying to conceptualize the notion of community without the linguistic implication of essential sameness as well as the us/them or in-group/out-group notion that is inherent within the word. We might describe it as a call for solidarity without assimilation, perhaps.

In Latin, for instance, “communio” means both “communion, mutual participation” but it can also mean “to fortify on all sides, to secure.” Thus, when we say “community” we are often saying, “Yeah, come and join us, but you have to become just like us if you want to and we’re committed to keep out everyone who is different from us” – as is often the case for church membership or how many people understand American citizenship. Likewise, in Latin “communis” means common, united, or universal,” and we can see the detriment of this aspect of community in some forms of communism in which the unity of the group forces a complete eradication of all individuality, creativity, and difference. Too often when people say, “we need to be united” they really mean, “we all need to agree and believe the exact same thing.”

There is something else going on in our notion of hospitality that makes it a paradox, for when I welcome someone into my home, I am situating myself as the powerbroker, the owner of the house, the one who is the master and sovereign of the place. They are a visitor to my abode, a guest inside my possession. In other words, the notion of hospitality is supposed to be one of graciousness and love and welcoming, but it is simultaneously annulled by these binary positions of power and non-power. As John Caputo summarizes, “There is an essential ‘self-limitation’ built right into the idea of hospitality, which preserves the distance between one’s own and the stranger… So there is always a little hostility in all hosting and hospitality, constituting a certain ‘hostil/pitality.’”

In this sense, hospitality is a contradiction, an “impossibility.” Caputo continues, “[H]ow can I graciously welcome the other while still retaining my sovereignty, my master of the house? How can I limit my gift? … Hospitality really starts to happen when I push against this limit, this threshold, this paralysis, inviting hospitality to cross its own threshold and limit, its own self-limitation, to become a gift beyond hospitality… That requires that the host must, in a moment of madness, tear up the understanding between him and the guest, act with ‘excess,’ make an absolute gift of his property, which is of course impossible. But that is the only way the guest can go away feeling as if he was really made at home.” In other words, hospitality begins when the lines between host and guest become blurred, when my notion of community is rid of its desire to fortify and secure.

A wonderful example of this is the scene in Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables in which the convict, Jean Valjean, stays at Bishop Monseigneur Bienvenu’s house. In the middle of the night, Jean Valjean steals away with the Bishop’s silver, pewter plates, and so forth. The next day, soldiers come to Bienvenu’s house (the maids all in a tizzy about the missing possessions), Jean Valjean in hand to inquire about the silver found in the convict’s knapsack. At the appearance of the convict, the old priest hurries up to him and exclaims, “Ah, there you are! I am glad to see you. But! I gave you the candlesticks also, which are silver like the rest, and would bring two hundred francs. Why did you not take them along with your plates?... My friend, before you go away, here are your candlesticks, take them… Now, go in peace. By the way, my friend, when you come again, you need not come through the garden. You can always come in and go out by the front door. It is closed only with a latch, day or night.”

Now that is hospitality!

Jesus said similar things. Jesus was once invited to a party by a wealthy religious ruler. At the party, he looked at the man who had invited him and said, “When you give a dinner or a banquet, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, lest they also invite you in return and you be repaid. But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you” (Luke 14:12-14). Jesus and Derrida agree: Hospitality is not about reciprocity and is too often confused with other things.

[To be Continued...]

Of Mice and Melon

There is much to catch you up on and so little precious time, so this blog post is essentially an update on a variety of things going on in our life.

Today is apt opportunity to provide a summary of our summer garden as we had our first snowfall here in Pittsburgh. Several weeks ago, the majority of our plants stopped producing (largely because the bees had left, I think) and most of the tomatoes were no longer ripening because it was getting cold. But that's not to say that the end of the season was uneventful. Not at all, indeed!

One day I went out there and almost walked through one of the largest, most wonderfully designed spiderwebs.... which would have been a lot more wonderful if it didn't have a ginormous spider in it - a feisty pregnant one at that. So what did I do? I did what my daring younger brother would do - I caught it and put it in a jar. Inside the jar, it spun a whole new web made this huge mothball sort of thing (full of eggs I presume) and just sat there. I kind of forgot all about it, and about two weeks later, at the beckoning of my wife for fear that they would get loose, hatch, and spread through the house, I went to dispose of the spider and throw its remains outside. It was STILL alive. I couldn't believe. Craziness.

Then there was the mystery plant that grew in our compost pile. It turned out to be a musk melon that fit in the palm of my hand. I picked it and cut it up to try it, but... well, needless to say there's a reason why they're supposed to be grown in tropical areas - it would have been three times in size and tasted ten times better!

Then there was the picking of our garden of what was left of the green tomatoes before the first frost. I told Amber I would do it, thinking I would get it done over the next weekend, only to find out that it was supposed to get below freezing the day I promised to do it! So, there I was out there after dark with a work lamp hung from my trash can wandering through our garden looking for what was left of our tomato crop. Anyone want some fried green tomatoes? Actually, we've put them in our basement in cardboard boxes and they are still changing color, which is a great thing!

In other news, we discovered this past weekend that we have/had a mouse. One morning we got up to find claw marks through a granola wrapper on the counter of our kitchen and half of the granola bar had been consumed. Uck. So, I checked under the stove behind the bottom drawer where I had long ago set a mouse trap and knew they had been known to congregate. I found mouse turds and a dead mouse in trap... which looked like it had been there for more than a few days. Even more Uck. Not sure if we've solved the problem, but we did a lot of major cleaning in the kitchen on Sunday afternoon and set up another trap.

And still in other, more pleasant, news this week I felt our baby boy kick for the first time! That's right, he's only four months old and he's already learning to declare his presence. It is, however, only the slightest tap and you really have to know what you're looking for. Amber said she was driving a couple days ago, drinking juice and listening to Journey on the radio and the kid was going nuts. Hilarious. So he's either a sugar addict or is going to have a crush on 80s music.

Is This Racism?

So, last Saturday, I was driving by a house only a couple blocks from mine on my way to the library book sale. It was one of those houses whose occupant has gone through a notable amount of work to make spooky for Halloween. He had transformed his lawn into a graveyard (an activity noticeably common among several of our neighbors and one for which I cannot personally comprehend its motivation!). Strewn across the grass were handmade tombstones all accompanied with what were supposed to be humorous clichés for epitaphs. There was one, for instance that said, “Rest In Pieces.” And there was another one that said, “Here lies an Atheist; all dressed up and nowhere to go.” Another one said, “Humpty Dumpty. ‘I was pushed.’”

But there was one out in the forefront that really caught me off guard as I drove, which said:

“-Juice- He got the noose.”

The first thing that crossed my mind was, “That guys condoning the lynching of black people!” Of course, I didn’t think he purposefully intended to imply such a notion, but there it was nonetheless. He was probably just trying to come up with something pithy that rhymed (another neighbor has a whole lawn full of things like, “Fred, fell and hit his head”), and meant it totally as a joke.

Now, you may be asking yourself, “How could that be construed to be condoning the lynching of black people?” Well, it’s quite simple really. “Noose” obviously refers to hanging people and “juice” is a nickname often associated (thought not entirely) among black people – “O.J.” Simpson was also nicknamed “The Juice” and the current quarterback for the Illinios college football team is named Juice Williams. It’s also the name of a 1992 film starring Tupac and the name of a couple different rappers.

Again, I don’t think the guy intended it to mean the comment to have that nature at all. In fact, I know he didn’t because I knocked on his door yesterday and asked him! That’s right, he turned about to be a guy about my age and he said it was a joke having to do with his friend named Josh. I don’t know what the joke is, and nor do I really care, but I just mentioned to him that I was a neighbor from nearby and thought I’d give him a heads up that some people might read the sign and find it offensive because it may be construed that he condones lynching. He, I think was astonished that I would say such a thing, but accepted the advice and that was the end of it.

But there’s still something nagging me here. Of course the sign is not explicit racism – like prohibiting a certain ethnic group from eating at your restaurant – and neither is it implicit racism – like overlooking the promotion of an African-American at a company [which, I might add, implicit discrimination and bigotry happen all the time in our society]. But might it be classified as unintentional racism?

Now why would I want to even suggest such a category? Because I think most of us are often so flippant with our words, our jokes, and our interactions with people (particularly those who are different from us) that we don’t even stop to think that what we say or do could sound racist or could be offensive. In other words, we just aren’t very sensitive to people. We are so consumed with ourselves, so accepting of the environment in which we have been raised, that we figure if someone is offended by what we say or do that it’s their problem.

Now, I’m not saying we should label my neighbor’s tombstone as a hate crime. That’s a bit extreme, and some activists – as evidenced by our current Presidential campaign – are sometimes too quick to shout “racism” when a white person is critical of the political views of a black person, for example. But the truth of the matter is, racism – explicit, implicit, and unintentional – is alive and well among us, and as Christians we ought to do whatever we can to create a culture of equality and charity. The truth is, there are enough white people in our country that won’t vote for Barack Obama simply because he’s black that he could conceivably lose the election because of racism (and about 30% of white voters would be upset if their daughter came home with a black boyfriend). In fact, just a couple days ago, Amber recounted a story from one of her friends who was canvassing on behalf of the Obama campaign. At one house, she knocked on the door and simply told the resident, “Hi we’re walking around on behalf of the Obama campaign and are just reminding people to vote on November 4th.” The resident replied, “Ma’am, there’s a reason why they call it the White House” and slammed the door.

We need to ask ourselves tough questions: Am I being racist when I lock my doors at the sight of a black person? Am I racist when I clutch my purse tighter when I see a black person? Am I being racist when I see a person of South American descent and instantly assume they’re an illegal immigrant from Mexico? Am I being racist when I see a black homeless person and try to avoid eye contact because I’m afraid they’re going to ask me for money?

I admit, I am not above saying things or doing things that are racist, sexist, and discriminatory. Amber has had to reprimand me on a couple occasions for saying to someone who knows English as a second language, “Wow, you have really good English,” which can come across as patronizing and derogatory rather than as a compliment if it sounds like I expect the person to know English, make it sound like English-speaking people are superior to the rest of the world, or act surprised that someone not from America or doesn’t look “American” (i.e., White Anglo) speaks English.

But we’re not going to learn how to be careful about such things as long as such dialogues are considered taboo and as long as we continue to remain segregated from those who are different from us, those who can give us guidance about the way the majority often offends the marginalized of society.

Drum Roll Please...

It's a boy! Check these out!

Side shot, little black spot is the heart, and you can kinda see a hand up above. He's got a big nose, which definitely means he's a Bahler.

Feet. Not much else to say except that I'm glad they found two of 'em!

Top of the head shot with a real clear picture of his hand. So cute!

The ultrasound tech did a good job of keeping the gender a secret up til the very end. She kept saying "Baby's head," "Baby's spine" (which was really cool to see), etc. And then, there it was. Definitely a boy - wasn't afraid to show his stuff. I had instant images of Calvin and Hobbes comic strips, and I can see him running through the house wet and naked already. There were a a couple times when he was scratching his head too (My mom said, "He must have been thinking" [as I always scratch my head when I think hard]). It was so cool. To think that you might already be able to see some of the personality of the child when they're that tiny. One of my coworkers said when she went to her first ultrasound, that was when she found out she was having twin boys. At one point, during the ultrasound, the two boys were facing each other and one of them visibly punched the other one in the face!! Needless to say, she said, they're still fighting with each other nine years later.

I'd also like to thank all of you who commented on the previous post about child-rearing as well as sponsoring a child. It's interesting how everyone has a different experience with their first kid. Back in Indianapolis, we hung out with a couple on a monthly basis to play board games who had a baby daughter, and it seemed like their lives barely changed at all - with the mere exception that they had to lug a bit more stuff with them when they came to our house. It just reminds me that as much as we try to come up with "one-size-fits-all" methods to so many things in this world, we don't really live in a world of universals (as much as we can think of them abstractly) but of particulars. We interact with individual and unique people with unique temperaments, likes and dislikes, and souls. This will even vary within families, no doubt. A parent may have a really calm or really antsy first child, and the second could be just the opposite.

Anywho, that's all for now... gotta get working on some homework!

One Child Coming, Another One Leaving

As my long intermission between blog posts would suggest, life has been quite busy here at the Bahler household. There's much to share, many stories to tell, and a lot of topics I want to touch upon in upcoming blog posts, but for the moment I'll suffice to write about one of them.

In two days, we go to get our first ultrasound. Our first pictures of our first child. Hopefully (s)he will dance a little jig so we can find out if its a boy or a girl. Amber's beginning to go into "nesting" mode and has taken up scouring the Craig's List ads for co-sleepers, cribs, and all things baby-related. We even bought diapers and other baby products on Sunday at CVS as they were greatly on sale. This is all well and good, and planning for the future is fine and dandy, but my mind has difficulty wrapping around what my life is going to be like in March of 2009 when it hasn't even had the time to think about next week. Last week was particularly difficulty thinking about all of this as we were hosting several strangers from out of town for a huge philosophy conference being hosted at Duquesne (more on that to come in later posts). So, I would come home each day completely exhausted and Amber would begin barraging me with questions about decorations for our baby room and crib designs. Of course, its not that I shouldn't be thinking about such things... its just going to take a while for me to get used to it!

On the other hand, a bit more than a week ago, I was notified that my sponsored child through Compassion International had been removed from the program. Upon finding out (which was frustrating to begin with, as my cell phone was called from a 1-800 number - and who picks up a call from a 1-800 number? - so I had to hear the news through a voice mail), I was shocked, then perplexed, and then angry. Abigail Asami is no longer my sponsored child. For nearly 11 years I've supported her - not that I'm saying this to boast, but simply to point out that this was a regular aspect of my life. Even more mesmerizing still is that she was kicked out because she's pregnant. My first thought when I heard this news was, "I wasn't a good enough sponsor. I should have contacted her more. I should have wrote more. I should have worked harder to go see her. I could have done something to prevent this." I thought, well, like a parent - about a girl who is no longer my child.

She's not a girl really either. She's 19 years old (Compassion children often do not graduate until they're 20 or 21) and has an 8th grade education. The Sponsor relations guy who called said she was healthy and was going to be fine because she had an interest in tailoring and had developed skills in being a seamstress. Well that's reassuring, but - and here is when my mind begins to flood with questions - what's a pregnant girl going to do out on her own with an 8th grade education? And why''s a child being kicked out of the program at the time when she needs support and encouragement and guidance the most? I wonder, if the Compassion workers were spending time talking about sex and puberty to my 18-year old instead of having her color pictures of animals to send to me with her letter, maybe she wouldn't have gotten into this mess.

Yesterday, I received a letter from Compassion and a final letter from my child (which, at times, sounds as if someone told her what to write). The Compassion letter states on one line, "Althought it is discouraging to see her start a family at such a young age, it may be helpful to understand that cultural values often influence these situations." So I ask myself, if its true that culture influences such situations, why should it be discouraging? Isn't it perfectly natural for a matured woman to start thinking about being a mother and being in a relationship? One of my cousins got married right out of high school and is getting ready to have her fourth child and she's not even 25 - something we might not embrace ourselves (because of certain other cultural influences), a circumstance we might consider difficult, but it doesn't have to be discouraging. Do Africans have to aspire to wait to start a family until they reach the age Americans are when they tend to start families these days?

I know all of this sounds like a rant and that I'm simply blaming Compassion for what has transpired. But at the moment, these are simply my raw thoughts and emotions on questions that I hope to get some answers. And I'm not against child sponsorship either - we will continue to support the other child we are sponsoring (although I may have to give some thought before taking on another one that I surmise Compassion is already sending my way). Child sponsorship, with all of its problems, is an awesome way to change the life of a child who would otherwise have little chance of success, and Compassion - as well as many other child sponsorship programs, are changing the lives of millions of children. But such a circumstance, such a dilemma, accentuates the weaknesses of the methodology behind a ministry of this kind and should cause us to question if there is a better way - a better way to visit the stranger and the orphan, a better way to make poverty history, and a better way to provide love and care to those who have been deprived of it.

But if it dies...

Flowers paling and leaves in unbloom
Bear the trace of an unforgotten fall
Wind whispering coolly a dirge of a tune
And all that it touches answers the call

Wait for redemption
Wait now; just lie
There is no prevention
To this season long sigh

A bewildering force, this chill in the air
Life, once vibrant, it bends from the sway
Winter surprises when we’re unaware
Seizing the colors now fading to grey

Wait for redemption
At the end of the night
Wait for the sensation
Of warmth and the light

Fields now feel barren, as an empty womb
Save for the memory of fruit grown and ripe
Just remnants of soul, they march to their tomb
Ashen, defeated, what’s left merely tripe

Wait for redemption
‘Midst this promise of death
Hope, don’t you mention
Just save your breath

Trees were once thriving, budding with green
Now become naked, bequeathing their crowns
Such wasting away, they had not foreseen
To watch all their glory fall to the ground

Wait for redemption
Not beauty that fades
No self-preservation
Will bring you more days

Verily, I say, as you plunge to the soil
Though red and purple; soon yellow and brown
No matter the pain no matter the toil
The yield you produce will be worth going down

Wait for redemption
Lie down to die
A peculiar salvation
Your ruin brings forth life

Endure in destruction
Wait through the strife
Soon comes liberation
From the Giver of Life

Suffer through death’s fray
Emancipation
Will come on the day
Your leaves heal the nations